
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2005 Los Feliz Community Police Center 1965 N. Hillhurst, Los Angeles, CA 90027 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/QUORUM CHECK
Click
Here for official notices regarding agenda posting,
public comment, disabled services and process for reconsideration.The meeting was called to order at 7:10 pm; a quorum was not present. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Spicer, Ron Weinstein, Merlyn Hernandez, Cheryl Johnson, Philip Gasteier, Nora Mosqueda, Joe Cisneros, Nyla Arslanian, Bruce Carroll, James Balesh, Kerry Hunnewell; Jonathon Kaplan presiding board member. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT: Patty Malone, Council District #4. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS None noted. 3. COMMENTS/REPORTS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND STAFF Patty Malone, representing Councilman Tom Labonge’s office (Council District 4), provided a presentation on a retaining wall to be rebuilt on Franklin Avenue. Ms. Malone also mentioned an equestrian bridge to be built leading into Griffith Park. Ms. Malone reported that Chief Frye would speak to the group about planned “red flag” days. 4. SENIOR LEAD OFFICER REPORTS None noted. 5. RED FLAG WARNING DAYS PARKING REGULATIONS Chief Mark Stormes, from the Los Angeles Fire Department’s Battalion 5, introduced himself and Tim Werle. Chief Stormes reported on the LAFD/DOT plan designating “choke points” in hillside areas where the danger of brush fire is greatest. The plan will implement a special parking enforcement program, on those days when the fire danger is greatest, that will provide for the removal of parked vehicles from key intersections, narrow roads and critical locations in the City’s Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Signs have been posted in affected areas. Chief Stormes also discussed his background and history with LAFD. Officer Werle reported on how information about the program will be disseminated, through e-mail, text messaging, flags at fire stations, and by calling 311, the City’s information line. Officer Werle also discussed notification plans for Red Flag days, advising attendees of the intent to display flags on fire stations, notice to be placed on the LAFD web site, and provision for contact by telephone. Patty Malone noted Councilman LaBonge’s planned drive-through review of the area with Chief Frye, scheduled for January 2006. Donald Brown, a stakeholder, referring to a sign posted on Glendower Avenue, asked about alternative parking and whether the red flag signage was appropriate on Glendower. Chief Stormes noted Mr. Brown’s concern and promised an investigation. Kathleen Corbin noted her concern about conflicting signage on Catalina Street. Chief Stormes discussed the intent behind posting the signs, and promised to investigate Ms. Corbin’s concerns. Joseph Schneider stated that checking for the flags on a daily basis is exhausting and expressed his wish for an alternative. Chief Stormes, noting the greater good, asked for sympathy and understanding. William Corbin asked how many and the process by which red flag days are announced; Dr. Corbin also proposed allowing parking on the sidewalk; Chief Stormes noted that parking was the purview of the DOT. Dr. Corbin asked about evacuation plans. Michele Yacso asked about exemptions for cars towed on red flag days. Chief Stormes suggested the appropriate action would be a dialogue with DOT. Ms. Yacso noted that resistance from citizens could be lessened by a dialogue. Rory Fitzpatrick stated that Councilman LaBonge’s office would follow up with DOT and Parking Enforcement on the issues discussed at this meeting among other things, and reminded attendees of the January drive-through review the Councilman plans. Bernadette Soter noted that the signs were misleading; stakeholder perceptions were that the signs limited parking at all times rather than on designated red flag days. Dan McCarty asked why the signs were posted now. Officer Stormes referred to the BelAir fire as a watershed event that pointed up the need for an evacuation plan as well as guaranteed accessibility. Cheryl Johnson supported Ms. Soter’s contention that the signs are misleading. Ms. Johnson asked if other, interested stakeholders and/or GGPNC Board members could participate in the planned January 2006 drive-through review in some way. Officer Werle suggested contacting Battalion 5 to arrange for a dialogue between LAFD and stakeholders. In answer to Ms. Johnson’s question, Chief Stormes stated that the signage was placed to assist emergency vehicles. Kerry Hunnewell suggested that flyers be placed on parked cars on red flag days by Parking Enforcement. Chief Stormes stated that Parking Enforcement could not take on that additional responsibility. Joe Cisneros reminded attendees that the LAFD’s intent was to protect citizens. Nyla Arslanian asked whether the priority was evacuation of citizens or emergency vehicle accessibility. Chief Stormes noted that the choke points refer to parked vehicles blocking access, and that citizen evacuation in an emergency situation should actually take place before emergency vehicles arrive. Ms. Arslanian also referred to signs that are confusing or not easily seen. Bruce Carroll asked about the timeline for the notification process. Chief Stormes gave more detail on how the red flag determination is made, which prompts emergency vehicle staging and notices posted. Richard Spicer discussed shared responsibility and financial incentives to further encourage homeowners to clear brush in affected areas. Chief Stormes summed up by noting stakeholders’ participation in the fire hazard prevention effort is crucial. 6. FRANKLIN AVE. RETAINING WALL See Item 3: Report by Patty Malone. 7. PLANNING/ZONING HISTORIC PRESERVATION a) 4500 Los Feliz Bl. Forum Assessment Ron Weinstein reported on a proposed assessment of the public forum and invited Board members to provide their suggestions and input. b) Draft MOU between Neighborhood Councils and Department. Of City Planning Mr. Weinstein reported on the first meeting on this issue, which he attended. Mr. Weinstein noted that board members and Planning Committee members have been invited to attend the upcoming January 7th meeting. c) Protected Tree Ordinance Mr. Weinstein discussed his Committee’s discussion and research on this issue, reporting that the Committee could not come to a consensus on appropriate action because they did not have sufficient, detailed information. Mr. Weinstein suggested that a presentation by an informed party before the Board should be done. 8. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT a) Allocation of Street Repair Funds. James Balesh reported on the funds set aside to support resurfacing of streets in the area. The streets designated by the Transportation Committee are Catalina Street (from Ambrose Avenue to Finley Avenue), Normandie Avenue (from Ambrose Avenue to Cummings Drive), Bates Avenue (from Sunset Drive to Fountain Avenue), Monon Street (from Griffith Park Boulevard to St. George Street), and Alexandria (from Ambrose to Mariposa). The total amount noted in the Transportation Committee report is $103,175. Nora Mosqueda, noting that the amount of funding mentioned was $100,000, asked how the additional funds would be obtained. Mr. Balesh assured Ms. Mosqueda that the overage would be taken into account. Cheryl Johnson asked what process was used to determine the streets to be designated for resurfacing. Mr. Balesh and Mr. Spicer explained how the streets were determined. No concerns or objections were noted by Board members present. Philip Gasteier noted his concern that the conditions set by the Bureau of Street Services are met. The record will reflect that the sense of the meeting was that actions taken in previous meetings were sufficient and appropriate. b) Reformation of the Mobility Action Committee (MAC) Noting that reformation of the Mobility Action Committee has been a priority for the past year, Mr. Balesh noted his intent to ask for an allocation of funds for the Mobility Action Committee, reported on the planning meeting he recently attended for this purpose, and reported on the request to host the first meeting. 9. PARKS, RIVERS & OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE Because action could not be taken on agenda items at this meeting, Bernadette Soter will present a report on the request submitted for a Griffith Park equestrian bridge at the next meeting. Ms. Soter reported on a plan to clean up and restore the Griffith Park Bird Sanctuary. Ms. Soter discussed the Pacific American Volunteer Association’s (PAVA) program adopting the Bird Sanctuary, noting that PAVA’s program and contract was announced without prior notice to any other area stakeholder association being given. In particular, Ms. Soter stated that PAVA’s plans include bringing in plants, in particular, that are not native to the area. This is not in line with the Bird Sanctuary’s original role, to keep native birds in Griffith Park. Ms. Soter noted her approval of the PAVA organization. Griffith Park Master Plan review update Ms. Soter encouraged attendance at an upcoming January 9th Master Plan Working Group meeting, at the Ranger Station, and reported on the review progress. In particular, she referred to User Needs Assessment, and reviewed the process by which this issue will be settled. Picnic space, permitted events and ball fields were specifically mentioned. Ms. Soter reported on an erroneous Ledger article discussing a ball field in Griffith Park. Cheryl Johnson stated that the Board had never, to her knowledge, taken a position regarding ball fields in Griffith Park. Kerry Hunnewell noted a severe need for fields that area soccer teams can use. Philip Gasteier asked Ms. Soter if the Master Plan Working Group is, in her opinion, more viable than it was previously and also asked how a individual group could be given control over an area of Griffith Park. Ms. Soter mentioned John Mukri attended a breakfast meeting with real estate developers, their contractors and suppliers in which the Master Plan was presented, noting that Mr. Mukri had never attended a Master Plan Working Group meeting. Ms. Soter expressed concern that the Working Group might not last much longer. James Balesh asked about facilities planned and available in the park. Richard Spicer asked the Master Plan, about budget line items that were approved and inventories taken; Mr. Spicer voiced his concern that affected Neighborhood Councils were left out of the loop. Ms. Soter mentioned sweat equity from Working Group members. Mr. Spicer suggested the Board offer public support of the Working Group’s contribution. Ms. Johnson suggested staging a public forum to discuss what facilities are available and planned in Griffith Park. Ms. Soter referred to the area’s per capita available recreational acreage, which she stated is the lowest in the U.S. b) Letter of support to be added to the Prop O application that Patty Malone CD4's is filing for an L.A. River/Atwater equestrian bridge into Griffith Park. Tabled until the next meeting. 10. TREASURER’S REPORT /GGPNC BUDGET PROCESS Action deferred until the next meeting. 11. OFFICER/BOARD VACANCY: SECRETARY/DISTRICT B POSITION Action deferred until the next meeting. 12. REVIEW OF MAYOR’S BUDGET SURVEY Action deferred until the next meeting. 13. DATA ENTRY FOR PUBLIC FORUM SIGN-IN SHEETS Nora Mosqueda reported on her efforts to arrange for data entry, stating that approximately 3 days of work will be needed. 14. OTHER COMMITTEE REPORTS None noted. 15. COMMENTS BY BOARD MEMBERS Kerry Hunnewell called the Board’s attention to an article in the Los Angeles Times discussing the Congress of Neighborhood Councils and suggested putting the issue on next month’s agenda. Ron Weinstein asked if the By-Laws Committee had reviewed changing the number needed to establish a quorum. Philip Gasteier responded and suggested implementing the change without delay. 16. OTHER COMMITTEE COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS None noted. Adjournment at 9:07 pm. BACK TO GGPNC HOME PAGE TOP OF THIS PAGE BOARD MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2005 Los Feliz Community Police Center 1965 N. Hillhurst, Los Angeles, CA 90027 The meeting was called to order at 7:13 pm; a quorum was not present. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Philip Gasteier, Shana Bonstin, Joe Cisneros, James B, Rosemary DeMonte, Joel Friedman, Charley Mims, Nora Mosqueda, Merlyn Hernandez, Kerry Hunnewell, Cheryl Johnson, Jonathon Kaplan, Jacqueline Kerr, Nyla Arslanian, Ron Weinstein, Rose Marin, Richard Spicer. Bruce Carroll GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Rory Fitzpatrick, Chief Field Deputy, Council District #4. Patty Malone LosFeliz/Silverlake Deputy for CD-4. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS No public announcements were noted. 3. COMMENTS/REPORTS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND STAFF Rory Fitzpatrick introduced Patty Malone, the new Deputy for Los Feliz/Silverlake; distributed copies of letters from Councilman Tom LaBonge (one regarding the Derby issue; the other stating Mr. LaBonge’s position on the Griffith Park Master Plan) and a City Guide to Neighborhood Services (published by the Los Angeles City Council). Mr. Fitzpatrick noted a deteriorating wall on the north side of Franklin (owned by the City) that is scheduled for repair. Since there may be disruption to area traffic, and because parking and public safety will be affected, Mr. Fitzpatrick promised to keep the NC and stakeholders abreast of the repair’s progress. In response to a question from Jonathan Kaplan with reference to traffic on Los Feliz Boulevard, Mr. Fitzpatrick listed Councilman LaBonge’s accomplishments while in office with respect to mitigating traffic and improving public transportation on Los Feliz. Item #1 revisited: A quorum being present, Nora Mosqueda moved to approve the minutes of the October 18, 2005 meeting; seconded by Cheryl Johnson. The minutes were approved by consensus. 4. SENIOR LEAD OFFICER REPORTS No reports were noted. 5. NORTHEAST LA COALITION OF NCs Kurt Rademaekers, representing the East/Northeast LA Coalition of Neighborhood Councils, stated his purpose in attending today’s meeting was to increase the opportunities for networking and information sharing between the Neighborhood Councils in the area and invited GGPNC Board and stakeholders to participate. Mr. Rademaekers referred to the LADWP MOU; the East/Northeast LA Coalition is working to set up a similar MOU with the City Planning Department, which has oversight of the CNC report. Mr. Rademaekers opined that the CNC report does not provide sufficient information. In an informal setting, recent attendees (which include Kan Hau,Greg Nelson, and Larry Frank) are invited to speak. General guidelines limit the attendance to NC Board members, committee or subcommittee chairs. Mr. Rademaekers promised to provide e-mail contact information to the Board. 6. LOS FELIZ VILLAGE HOLIDAY EVENT Rosemary DeMonte speaking for Dora Herrera, provided information on the 1st annual Los Feliz Village Holiday event, which will take place December 10, 2005, from 6pm-10pm. Ms. DeMonte described the planned activities to take place during that event and noted attendees. Ms. DeMonte reported that the festival’s organizers have asked for a contribution from the NC. Discussion about outreach efforts that could be made at the holiday event followed, as well as debate on the NC’s position on participation in non-sectarian holiday events. Charley Mims suggested continuing the discussion of the holiday event in the Outreach Committee meeting, which will be directed to make suggestions to the Executive Committee. 7. GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF HOMELESS SERVICES (Taken out of order) Molly Rysman referred to articles published in the Los Angeles Times, written by columnist Steve Lopez, that addressed the issue of homelessness in the LA area, and called for the NC to review what could be done to provide “real leadership” to the LA community on this issue, which she feels is getting out of control. Ms. Rysman provided a copy of Mr. Lopez’ column for October 23, 2005, and stated her belief that the City could do more regarding homelessness. Charley Mims invited Ms. Rysman to attend an executive committee meeting to discuss the issue further. 8. PREFERENTIAL PARKING Citing a stakeholder's request for preferential parking near her residence, Philip Gasteier recommended that the NC develop an overall policy and notification procedure on this issue consistent with the NC's representation of a broad spectrum of interests, and review requests for preferential parking under this general policy and procedure (rather than ad hoc). Charley Mims suggested referring the issue to the Transportation Committee, and asked if Mr. Gasteier had a framework in mind; Mr. Gasteier stated that he preferred to assist in a joint effort. After further discussion, it became clear that this issue has been discussed both in committee and in general meetings several times and that, in view of priorities, the issue will be tabled at this point. 9. NATIVE TREE ORDINANCE Molly Rysman brought the proposed LA City Council Protected Tree Ordinance to the Board’s attention. Discussion followed regarding the appropriate Committee to review this subject; it was referred to the PROS and Planning/Zoning Historic Preservation Committees for further discussion. Ms. Rysman recused herself from voting on the issue, because of possible conflict of interest due to her employment with Councilman Garcetti’s office. 10. AGENDA POSTING LOCATIONS IN GRIFFITH PARK. Ron Weinstein reported that two of the five locations specified for posting notices are not easily accessible to the public. The issue will be referred to the Executive Committee for review. Charley Mims noted that DONE is considering changing the number. There being a quorum present, Charley Mims took the opportunity to present Jacqueline Kerr a Certificate of Appreciation from the City of Los Angeles for her service to the community and to the Neighborhood Council in particular. Ms. Kerr will change her residence in the near future. Issued by City of Los Angeles, a Certificate of Appreciation is hereby presented to Jacqueline Kerr of the Greater Griffith Park Neighborhood Council for your hard work and dedication that contributed to making our neighborhood a safer and better place in which to live, presented by Tom LaBonge, Council Member for the Fourth District. Ms. Kerr expressed her thanks. 11. PLANNING/ZONING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE 4500 Los Feliz Boulevard Project Ken Owen summarized the results of surveys resulting from the recent Forum on the referenced project, which have been published on the GGPNC web site. The forum was attended by well over 500 people. Mr. Owen provided detail, gave a short analysis of the responses received, summarized expenditures for the event, and made reference to actions recommended to be taken by the Board. Charley Mims thanked Mr. Owen, Bruce Carroll and Ron Weinstein for their efforts. Ron Weinstein listed the Committee’s recommendations and moved to adopt the following: The Greater Griffith Park Neighborhood Council 1. Opposes the development as proposed; 2. Supports the preservation of the Derby/Louise’s building; 3. Supports development only if it is in keep with the village character of residential and business buildings on Los Feliz, Hillhurst and Avocado, including the preservation and maintenance of historical trees; 4. Encourages proposals to reduce traffic congestion and the shortage of parking while retaining current street widths; 5. Supports continuing to monitor and advise the City of Los Angeles on proposals and issues pertaining to the site of the proposed development, working with its planning, zoning and historic preservation committee as the primary point of contact for stakeholders; Mr. Weinstein moved that the board adopt these recommendations and to disband the 4500 Los Feliz Subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Jacqueline Kerr. Rebecca Goodman, representing the Save the Derby Coalition, extended her thanks to the Board, committee, subcommittee and community as a whole, noted her appreciation of the outcome, extended the Coalition’s support of the recommendations made, and expressed her hope for a satisfactory outcome of the development of the subject property. Dino Tudor spoke about the real issue at hand, which he felt was the zoning change. Katarina Ryan, property owner of the lot (4515 Avocado Street) immediately adjacent to the proposed development, expressed her concerns. Rick Gable, representing Hillhurst/Los Feliz LLC, thanked the NC for their efforts and expressed his hope for cooperative efforts between the developer and the community. Charley Mims noted that the issue should be dealt with sensitively and his agreement with Mr. Gable that the process should be a cooperative one. Mr. Gable stated that the next proposal would be provided to the NC and other community groups prior to submission. Discussion among Board members began with the position of the LA Conservancy with reference to preservation of an historical site, and covered a range of topics, including the subcommittee’s recommendations, the developer’s by-right limitations, stakeholders’ opinions, not disbanding the subcommittee, and amending the motion to establish a formal means of facilitation with the developer. Rosemary DeMonte suggested establishing a panel of stakeholders to review a new proposal. Jacqueline Kerr noted that Elizabeth Shukar, the Chair of the Silverlake NC Planning/Zoning Committee, stated she would be interested in being part of an oversight committee. Jonathon Kaplan noted his support of the motion and summed up the intent of a broad statement that could ultimately involve the establishment of an ad hoc committee that would work with the developer to work out issues cooperatively. In response to Cheryl Johnson’s question, Mr. Mims asked Mr. Gable if the developer was open to participation in a focus or advisory group. Mr. Gable replied affirmatively. Kerry Hunnewell asked Mr. Weinstein if the motion’s part #5 could be amended to include: the committee will examine facilitating a vehicle for the community to provide input to the developer with the intent in mind being a successful development. There was no opposition to the amendment from the original seconder (Jacqueline Kerr). Charley Mims declared a consensus. The motion passed. Stakeholders that were evidently not aware of the proper procedure and had not provided speaker cards asked to speak. Nora Mosqueda moved to reconsider the issue, to allow for public comment, which was seconded by Cheryl Johnson. There being no objection, those interested in making comments were asked to provide speaker cards. Their comments follow: Dino Tudor brought a similar development project to the Board’s attention and compared the subject development proposal to that one. Deborah Levine expressed her concern that the motion as presented by Ron Weinstein was too broad in scope. Dennis Potokar reminded Board members that their efforts are precedent-setting. Marcella Manzanedo voiced her opinion of the developer’s outreach efforts to date and made suggestions about how future efforts could be accomplished. Elizabeth Jurado noted that she was unsure of the effectiveness of the Committee’s recommendations. Katarina Ryan opined that “keeping the village atmosphere” is vague and should be amended. Ron Weinstein reintroduced the motion as amended; seconded by Jacqueline Kerr. Charley Mims declared consensus. Mr. Mims thanked all those attending for their participation and interest. Rosemary DeMonte welcomed interest in the outreach efforts and asked attendees to sign up on the GGPNC website to receive updates. 12. PROS COMMITTEE REPORT Bernadette Soter updated the committee on disabled access of the Griffith Park Observatory and reported on a special tour arranged for Donna Dougherty and others at the result of efforts by Councilman LaBonge, and that the May 14, 2006 opening date has been moved back to Fall 2006. This may allow time to create a workable, acceptable access plan. Ms. Soter also provided an update on the management change she reported at the last meeting. Ms. Soter noted that the management change had the intent to create an executive position solely responsible for administering Griffith Park, however, Vicky Israel, the new manager, has responsibility for a wide area and may not be able to provide sufficient oversight of the large-scale Griffith Park Master Plan. Ms. Soter went on to discuss her unsuccessful attempts to gain an idea of the park’s financial status, until a audit was ordered by Laura Chick, perhaps as a result of an article published by the Los Angeles Times concerning Griffith Park’s financial situation. Referring to a need for additional Park Ranger services, and reported dearth of funds to pay for those services, Ms. Soter noted that funds to pay for the 35 additional Park Rangers needed could be gotten from a possible $21.5 million surplus uncovered by the audit. Ms. Soter reported on outreach efforts regarding the Griffith Park Master plan and indicated that reports from the Recreation and Parks Department (RAP) that opposition to the Master Plan has been voiced in a majority of responses to surveys, as well as a public statement by all the Los Angeles area Sierra Club groups. Ron Weinstein asked if the Griffith Park Master Plan is another issue that could require a Town Hall forum. Ms. Soter listed circumstances under which a Town Hall forum could be important. Charley Mims suggested that the proper time to consider or schedule a public forum is after the Master Plan has been formalized. Molly Rysman asked if Mayor Villaraigosa has appointed a Parks Commissioner. Mr. Mims noted that there had been two Parks Commission vacancies. Ms. Soter noted that of the four Parks Commissioners, one position is still vacant. Ms. Rysman mentioned that filling the Parks Commissioner vacancy might be an appropriate one to lobby the Mayor’s office about, since that person could have an effect on the Griffith Park Master Plan. Mr. Mims provided the names of appropriate individuals to contact in the City government. Richard Spicer suggested providing collaborative funding to the PROS Committee to support an independent assessment, and also finding away to effectively communicate with the Mayor’s office on the Griffith Park Master Plan. Mr. Mims suggested contacting Jimmy Blackman. Ms. Rysman and Ms. Soter will coordinate efforts in this regard. Ms. Soter announced that the next PROS meeting will be held on December 5, 2005, at the Griffith Park Ranger Station. 13. TREASURER’S REPORT This item is deferred. 14. OFFICER VACANCY Charley Mims noted that the opportunity exists to recruit an officer to fill the Recording Secretary vacancy. The issue will be discussed at the next Executive Committee meeting. Mr. Mims asked Board members to review possible candidates to fill the vacancy. 15. REVIEW OF MAYOR’S BUDGET SURVEY Charley Mims noted that he had not yet received completed surveys from all Board members, and that collective responses are still to be made. Nora Mosqueda suggested tabulating the responses of Board members to determine how rankings should be made for the collective survey. There being no objection, Mr. Mims stated that Ms. Mosqueda’s suggestion would be followed. 16. OTHER COMMITTEE REPORTS Outreach Committee Report Rosemary DeMonte, speaking about the results of the Town Hall Forum, suggested hiring a data entry person to include the responses obtained from the forum. Richard Spicer clarified what should be done. The Outreach Committee will review suggestions made by several Board members. Neighborhood Improvement Committee Report Charley Mims thanked Nyla Arslanian and Cheryl Johnson for their fund raising efforts on behalf of the Barnsdall Art Park. Ms. Arslanian updated the Board on the Hollywood Boulevard Streetscape and Vermont Triangle project, and reported there would be no community meetings regarding these projects until after the holiday season. 17. BOARD COMMENTS Richard Spicer discussed homeless issues, following up on Molly Rysman’s earlier comments. Mr. Spicer suggested adding the homeless issue as a fifth priority to the GGPNC Strategic Plan. Jacqueline Kerr suggested establishing an ad hoc committee to review the organizational process used to set up the public forum, as an aid to future event planning. Ken Owen and Ron Weinstein will provide their notes to the Executive Committee for further action. Nora Mosqueda, noting that ABC lent the equipment used at the public forum, suggested that a letter of thanks would be appropriate. Charley Mims asked Ron Weinstein to draft a letter thanking ABC. Bruce Carroll noted 16,000 hits on the GGPNC web site for the month of November 2005. Bruce Carroll moved to adjourn. There was unanimous agreement to adjourn the meet at 9:50 pm. Click
Here for official notices regarding agenda posting,
public comment, disabled services and process for reconsideration.
BACK TO
GGPNC HOME PAGE TOP OF THIS PAGE BOARD MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2005 Los Feliz Community Police Center 1965 N. Hillhurst, Los Angeles, CA 90027 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/QUORUM CHECK The meeting was called to order at 7:10 pm; a quorum was not present. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Joe Cisneros, James Balesh, Philip Gasteier, Shana Bonstin, Bruce Carroll, Cheryl Johnson, Joel Friedman, Rosemary DeMonte, Molly Rysman, Ron Weinstein, Nyla Arslanian, Rose Marin, Richard Spicer, Merlyn Hernandez. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Rory Fitzpatrick, Chief Field Deputy, Council District #4, Matthew Levy, Field Deputy for Los Feliz and Silverlake. Christine Jerian, DONE Project Coordinator. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT John Larner, Head of Lycee International de Los Angeles and the LILA Los Feliz campus located on Russell Avenue, introduced himself to the Board and spoke on behalf of LILA. Mr. Larner invited any interested parties to contact him at the Los Feliz campus. Christine Jerian, DONE Project Coordinator, introduced herself to the Board as the new GGPNeighborhood Councils Project Coordinator. Ryan Bell, Senior Pastor of the Hollywood 7th Day Adventist Church, introduced himself to attendees. Mr. Bell noted his motive in attending the meeting today was to advise the Council of two robberies in the past 8 days that have occurred in the apartment complex in which Mr. Bell and his family live. Mr. Bell’s wife and two small children were eyewitnesses to one of the robberies. Mr. Bell remarked that he and his neighbors in the apartment complex are very concerned about public safety. Charlie Mims thanked Mr. Bell for bringing this information to the Council’s attention, and noted Mr. Bell’s concerns and willingness to assist would be referred to the Public Safety Committee. Jim McQuiston, EHCA, discussed the selection of a group that will analyze the management of the Neighborhood Councils, the various Boards, DONE and ordinances that govern the Neighborhood Councils. Mr. McQuiston stated that a 45 day deadline was set on September 28, 2005 for input from the various Neighborhood Councils, and noted that his appearance at today’s meeting was to ensure that the GGPNC Board was aware of the deadline. Raymond Yu mentioned the Metro Orange Line between North Hollywood to Woodland Hills. Mr. Yu gave a great deal of detail about the Metro Orange line. Mr. Yu noted that trial rides would take place between the North Hollywood and the Woodland Hills Station, on October 29th and 30th between 8am and midnight. Rory Fitzpatrick discussed the third public meeting featuring mitigation plans for the Griffith Park Observatory, which took place on Monday, October 17, 2005. Mr. Fitzpatrick noted that Matthew Levy, Area Deputy, will be replaced shortly by Patricia Malone; Mr. Fitzpatrick mentioned Ms. Malone’s qualifications and contact information; Mr. Fitzpatrick also listed Mr. Levy’s contributions in his capacity as a Field Deputy. Matthew Levy provided an update on the major projects in the GGPNC area currently on the table at his departure: architectural renderings are almost ready for public review of the proposed Vermont Avenue parking structure and the Postal Service facility to be located at Vermont and Melbourne. Mr. Levy noted that the multi-level parking structure will be kept to a level close to the brick building near the proposed development. Mr. Levy also discussed an upcoming change of policy with reference to approval of preferential parking district. Mr. Levy also discussed bulky item pickup efforts in the area, as well as the installation of a traffic signal at the 5 Freeway off-ramp and Riverside Drive; the Vermont Triangle project, and efforts to reduce vermin infestation in the area; and plans to seek beautification grant funds. Mr. Levy stated that the Headworks project, intended to produce additional potable drinking water for LA, is a project that will not falter despite his absence. Charley Mims thanked Mr. Levy for his efforts and reminded Mr. Levy that he is welcome to return at any point, especially for pro bono work. Cheryl Johnson asked Mr. Levy about Griffith Park Observatory handicapped access efforts; Mr. Levy stated that the Observatory was judged to have adequate accessibility. Rosemary DeMonte asked for details of plans for determining a preferential parking district; Mr. Levy and Mr. Fitzpatrick both provided insight into the process. Mr. Fitzpatrick noted that input from the Neighborhood Councils was welcomed. Richard Spicer asked Mr. Levy about an update on the schedule of work being done at the junction of I-5 and Riverside Drive. Mr. Levy provided background information on how the process is coordinated between CALTRANS and DOT. Charley Mims introduced Commissioner Yolanda Fuentes, Neighborhood Liaison for the City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Commissioner Fuentes outlined responsibilities performed by various DPW agencies (Sanitation, Street Services, Street Lighting, Contract Administration, Bureau of Engineering). Ms. Fuentes is lead Commissioner for Proposition K. Ms. Fuentes reminded attendees of Operation Pothole and asked for assistance in identifying streets where potholes have occurred. Ms. Fuentes noted that she welcomed input from the Neighborhood Councils, volunteered her assistance in coordinating efforts to contact City of Los Angeles departments, and introduced David Mace, coordinator for outreach with reference to Neighborhood Councils. Charley Mims noted Commissioner Fuentes’ efforts and dedication, and welcomed David Mace. 3. COMMENTS/REPORTS FROM PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND STAFF 4. SENIOR LEAD OFFICER No reports noted. 5. HOLLYWOOD-WESTERN REDEVELOPMENT Samir Srvastava, representative of ABS (the developer for the south side of the “Hollywood Passage” project) discussed the project as well as his background and qualifications for the proposed development. The project is still in very preliminary stages, and Mr. Srvastava reminded attendees of a planned sheret of Neighborhood Councils with the project developers. Mr. Srvastava noted that he was at one time a resident of the community, and that his experience in the neighborhood influenced his decision to request a variance to allow for excess parking. Molly Rysman stated the “green” roofs were a point of concern and noted an upcoming report to be released. Mr. Srvastava reiterated that affordable housing was an issue that was a driving force in the planned project. Shana Bonstin asked about St. Andrews being blocked off; Bruce Carroll reiterated Ms. Bonstin’s concern. Mr. Srvastava discussed rationales and emphasized that the project is still in the preliminary stages. Richard Spicer asked about timing of CRA inspections, how long the affordable housing will be affordable, and parking. Mr. Srvastava’s estimate referred to late 2009 to 2010 for the project’s completion. Mr. Srvastava noted that he expected to be able to keep the affordable housing rates for 55 years, and noted provisions for subterranean parking. Mr. Srvastava discussed his plans to have the space occupied by arts groups (theater arts in particular), in answer to Nyla Arslanian’s question. Raymond Yu, a stakeholder, asked about a traffic signal at Hollywood at St. Andrews Place and security provisions for the proposed library. Mr. Srvastava discussed plans for traffic signals and assured the stakeholder that that his suggestions would be taken into account. 6. MAYOR’S BUDGET DAY AND BUDGET PROCESS This item was postponed until later in the meeting. 7. PROPOSAL TO CREATE A CHARTER FOR A CITYWIDE CONGRESS OF NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCILS At Kerry Hunnewell’s request, due to his unplanned absence from today’s meeting, this item will be carried over until the next meeting. Bruce Carroll reminded Board members that information on this issue was included in the handouts for today’s meeting. 8. PLANNING/ZONING HISTORIC PRESERVATION Ron Weinstein noted a change in the proposed budget for the Nov. 10th public forum, because additional stakeholders (20,150 addresses as opposed to 10,000) were identified; an additional amount was approved at a recent Executive Committee Meeting. Ken Owen, chairman of the 4500 Los Feliz subcommittee, detailed planning efforts with respect to the November meeting. Mr. Owen listed those officials who will appear, noted that all invited participants have accepted, and discussed preliminary plans. Plans for outreach efforts in conjunction with the meeting, and efforts at promoting GGPNC Board minutes 10/18/05 page 3 GGPNC are were discussed. It was agreed that a flier about GGPNC’s core functions (that offers the opportunity to sign in) given to attendees would be a worthwhile outreach effort and could augment the GGPNC stakeholder lists. Molly Rysman asked about translation services. Ken Owen mentioned that there were no funds set aside for that purpose. Ms. Rysman suggested contacting Council District 4 to request assistance in providing translation services. Charley Mims detailed the presentation planned by the developer. Further discussion ranged from plans for follow-up meeting to additional advertising efforts. Ken Owen relayed a request made by the Silverlake Neighborhood Council that provision be made for written comments. Philip Gasteier, while acknowledging that the planned 300 person attendee level may not be reached, asked about overflow provisions. Suggestions were made to provide for that contingency, including a suggestion to refer interested parties to the web site. Rosemary DeMonte, Molly Rysman, Cheryl Johnson, and Rose Marin will staff the Outreach table planned. Provisions were made for crowd control, as well. 9. PARKS, RIVERS & OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE Bernadette Soter, following up Donna Dougherty’s September GGPNC presentation concerning handicapped accessibility at the Griffith Park Observatory, discussed the rationale behind the objections voiced as well as justification for proposed development. Ms. Soter noted the City of Los Angeles position is that technically the rehab work is in compliance with code, and that the motivating intent was to preserve the “historic fabric” of the building. After further discussion, Charley Mims suggested asking that Sammy Wong, City of Los Angeles Bureau of Engineering, and Donna Doherty, as well as people with expertise on this issue, be invited to attend the next PROS committee meeting. Jim McQuiston provided a different perspective, and indicated his belief that Tom LaBonge would not entertain any further discussion on the issue. Ms. Soter summarized efforts made and issues discussed at the most recent Griffith Park Master Plan Working Group meeting (October 11th); Ms. Soter mentioned the reassignment of the two Griffith Park manager and the creation of a Griffith Park Superintendent position that will have oversight of four entities that don’t have obvious connections to each other. Ms. Soter reiterated concern expressed about the viability of the Working Group, as a result of the personnel change and redefinition of Griffith Park as a region. Philip Gasteier asked who had decision-making capacity in this instance, and suggested that a meaningful reorganization of management of Griffith Park should include prior notification to Neighborhood Councils. Ms. Soter reiterated her concern about the Working Group’s function and purpose in the light of the recent “sudden” change. Ms. Soter discussed the length of time it has taken to obtain financial information on Griffith Park, which she has not yet seen despite framing the request following proper procedure. Charley Mims provided his insight on how decisions are made for revenue and expenditure for various Recreation and Parks entities. Ms. Soter asked that Board Members to attend the upcoming PROS committee meeting. 10. TREASURER’S REPORT Joel Friedman detailed his efforts to obtain expected budgets from committee members and reminded attendees that their input was necessary. 11. OFFICER VACANCY Charley Mims asked for a Board Member to step up to fill the Secretary vacancy. In response to a question from Rosemary DeMonte, Bruce Carroll detailed the Secretary’s responsibilities. Richard Spicer suggested delegating responsibilities to a contractor; Bruce Carroll added his insight to Mr. Spicer’s suggestion. This item was deferred for further discussion at the next meeting. 12. NEIGHBORING NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCILS IN FORMATION Charley Mims called for a motion to support the HSNC in the formation of a new Neighborhood Council. Bruce Carroll moved to support the Hollywood Studio Neighborhood Council, seconded by Philip Gasteier. There being no Board Member objection, a consensus was declared. 13. HOLLYWOOD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE LUNCHEON Rosemary DeMonte provided details, including who plans to attend, and when and where the luncheon will take place; James Balesh cannot attend; Merlyn Hernandez asked for details. Discussion resulted; Merlyn will attend. ITEM #1 REVISITED A quorum being present, Bruce Carroll moved to approve the Minutes for two meetings, with two minor changes; . Approved by consensus. ITEM #6 REVISITED Charley Mims discussed the Mayor’s Budget Day, and called for discussion of the points raised by Mayor Villaraigosa. Mr. Mims mentioned in particular funds set aside for education and suggested an emphasis on educational expenditures. Mr. Mims called for identification of priorities by individual Board Members. Mr. Mims identified a possible solution for street resurfacing—a bond issue. Philip Gasteier suggested enhancing bus service, for instance, rather than street resurfacing. Bruce Carroll suggested incentives to encourage people to work in the community in which they live. Jim McQuiston reminded Board Members that the intent was to gain Board Members’ personal perspectives; Mr. McQuiston also discussed possible Brown Act violation, and advised that the Board Members think carefully about the suggestions to be made. Mr. Mims asked that Board Members return the questionnaires to him by next week. Discussion continued on the issues. It was agreed that Board Members would advise Mr. Mims of issues mentioned in the questionnaires. 14. OTHER COMMITTEE REPORTS None noted. 15. COMMENTS BY BOARD MEMBERS Joe Cisneros noted that 10 high school seniors would be available to assist at the November 10, 2005 meeting. 16. OTHER COMMITTEE COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS None noted. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Click Here for official notices regarding agenda posting, public comment, disabled services and process for reconsideration. BACK TO GGPNC HOME PAGE TOP OF THIS PAGE BOARD MEETING MINUTES
1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/QUORUM CHECK/APPROVAL OF MINUTESTUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 Los Feliz Community Police Center 1965 N. Hillhurst, Los Angeles, CA 90027 The meeting was called to order at 7:15 pm; a quorum was present. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Charley Mims, Joe Cisneros, Rosemary DeMonte, Nyla Arslanian, Bruce Carroll, Joel Friedman, Jacqueline Kerr, Kerry Hunnewell, Molly Rysman, Ron Weinstein, Philip Gasteier, Richard Spicer, Cheryl Johnson. Shana (Murphy) Bonstin and James Balesh were also present. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE PRESENT: Rory Fitzpatrick, Chief Field Deputy, Council District #4. 2. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Rory Fitzpatrick announced a pilot program for area multi unit buildings concerning a free pilot bulky item pick-up program, which will be offered Oct-Dec 2005 by the Bureau of Sanitation and the Council Office. Mr. Fitzpatrick noted that 5 or more unit buildings pay for pick up privately; apartment buildings typically are the largest contributors to the City’s pick-up of bulky items. Mr. Fitzpatrick indicated that single family residents typically bear the cost for bulky item pick-up; this program is an attempt to pass the costs on to apartment buildings, as well as generate funds for additional staff and equipment. Rosemary DeMonte asked what dissemination efforts have been made to advise stakeholders of the program; Mr. Fitzpatrick mentioned the Apartment House Owners Association specifically and asked for the assistance of the GGPNC. Paul Habib, from Senate Majority Leader Dario Frommer’s office, thanked Charley Mims for inviting him to attend, and discussed programs Dario Frommer has championed, which include lower prescription drug costs for seniors and the California Hope Endowment (a plan to supplement money the state currently spends on higher education by establishing a trust to handle and lease property owned by the state). One program is intended to ensure the state agencies that purchase drugs buy in bulk (to extend cost savings to taxpayers); another program will investigate and certify internet drug companies. Mr. Habib also provided information concerning the Urban Parks Act. Donna Dougherty, Griffith Observatory Access Initiative, spoke about the Griffith Park Observatory, which she contends will not be easily accessible to handicapped citizens. The current design calls for wheelchair access at the back side of the building, necessary because of the claim that the doors cannot easily be automated. Ms. Dougherty referred to a Universal Design Code that could have been used in renovating the Observatory’s front entrance, to include sloping walkways (one foot rise to 20 feet) to provide access to the newly renovated Observatory building. Ms. Dougherty provided examples of renovations to public buildings that ensure disabled people have full access to these buildings. Ms. Dougherty noted the amount of money spent on renovations to the Observatory building; she referred to the small window of time still available before the stairs are put back into place. Ms. Dougherty distributed copies of a petition to request the Board of Recreation and Parks “reconsider certain design issues involving Griffith Park Observatory to add additional wheelchair ramps in the front of Griffith Park Observatory to ensure that disabled people can have full and easy access to the Observatory....” Ms. Dougherty contended that the issue driving this situation is one of equal rights; she detailed efforts made over the past 10 months to resolve the issue. Charley Mims referred the issue to the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Committee and asked Ms. Dougherty if she could be available to attend an upcoming PROS Committee meeting. 5. HOLLYWOOD STUDIO DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL (taken out of order) Ziggy Kruse asked for support for the formation of the Hollywood Studio District Neighborhood Council (HSDNC); the hearing date is tentatively set for October 18, 2005. Jacqueline Kerr stated that a letter of support for the new Neighborhood Council would be appropriate. She also asked for financial support (as well as contribution of toys) of the 2nd annual PATH benefit, which will take place on December 11, 2005. Kerry Hunnewell moved that the GGPNC provide $200 to the HSDNC in formation as an outreach effort for the purpose sponsoring a joint holiday event; seconded by Jacqueline Kerr. Mims declared consensus on the issue. Rosemary DeMonte moved to support HSGNC seconded by Kerry Hunnewell. Charley Mims declared consensus. Charley Mims asked for the boundaries of the new Neighborhood Council, which Ms. Kruse indicated would be from Hollywood Blvd on the south to Melrose on north, El Centro from the west to Western Avenue, and including the area bounded by Normandie along the freeway to La Mirada to Western to Hollywood. Ms. Kruse asked for assistance from Board Members to identify unaffiliated homeowners and/or homeowners associations that might be interested in attending a group that will provide oversight of planning and development in the area. 7. PROS COMMITTEE REPORT In Bernadette Soter’s absence, Charley Mims presented Ms. Soter’s written report, which details the PROS Committee’s efforts to date. In particular: a meeting with the Department of Recreation and Parks to obtain detailed information on Griffith Park’s annual revenues and expenses; revision of the Vision and Goals Statement of the Griffith Park Master Plan with reference to the establishment of an Urban Wilderness area; the September 22, 2005 Ranger Station dedication ceremony; a Working Group meeting October 3, 2005 at the Ranger Station; and an upcoming KCET half-hour feature taping. 8. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE PROPOSAL TO DOWNGRADE A PORTION OF FRANKLIN AVENUE Charley Mims discussed the rationale behind considering support of this proposal, intended to be a more permanent protection for the historic Shakespeare bridge. Cheryl Johnson moved to support the proposal; seconded by Kerry Hunnewell. Mims declared consensus on this issue. Richard Spicer noted that his co-chair had a conflict; Mr. Spicer distributed a priority list, prepared by Councilman LaBonge’s office, of streets planned to be resurfaced in 2005-2006 by the Bureau of Street Services. In response to Charley Mims’ question, it was noted that one street in the GGPNC area was specified on the list. Rory Fitzpatrick explained that, once the Committee receives the appropriate training and the relevant funds, this list can be used to assist in deciding how best to use the $100,000 in funding to be provided to GGPNC for resurfacing. With reference to improving traffic flow on Los Feliz, Mr. Spicer presented a draft of recommendations considered by the Transportation Committee and asked for review and comments. Mr. Fitzpatrick discussed recent developments with regard to the Mobility Action Committee, as well as that committee’s future plans. In response to a question posed by Kerry Hunnewell, Mr. Fitzpatrick discussed how the decision is made to repave original concrete streets and what material is used for repaving these streets. Richard Spicer noted that the MTA Board has adjusted the schedule of the 175 bus that serves Marshall High School; there will be no service between 10am and 2pm. Also, speed signs at King are planned to be improved. 4. SIDEWALK REPAIR PROPOSALS Julie Buttram, General Manager, SEIU Local 347, and Bill Robertson, Director, Bureau of Street Services, jointly discussed programs intended to assist homeowners and stakeholders to identify and repair those sidewalks in need of repair. According to state law, the property owner is responsible for sidewalk upkeep. The City of LA is proposing to resolve the sidewalk repair issue for more than 10,000 miles of sidewalks, of which approximately 4,600 needs repair. Mr. Robertson detailed the “huge problem” that has been identified with reference to sidewalks in the City of Los Angeles (resulting from unclear designation of responsibility, lack of funding, lack of maintenance—root trimming, inexpert choice of location and type of trees to plant, and jurisdictional issues). Mr. Robertson described how sidewalk repairs have been done in the City of Piedmont, using the point-of-sale program; this program is voluntary from the homeowner’s standpoint; the point-of-sale program places a lien against the subject property that comes due when the property is sold. Mr. Robertson discussed costs to homeowners, experimental use of rubber sidewalk panels that allow periodic root trimming and other efforts he has led to save City taxpayers’ funds; he stated that the 50/50 program “does not provide the answer.” Because trees are the only part of the City’s infrastructure that increases in value, tree removal is not an optimal solution. Ms. Buttram and Mr. Robertson both mentioned work done with Dr. Shoop (sp?) at UCLA with respect to urban planning and development; Mr. Robertson remarked that the Neighborhood Councils are his department’s strongest advocates and asked for support in his efforts. Mr. Robertson stated that a target repair amount of 375 sidewalk miles per year for ten years would eliminate the repair problem. Philip Gasteier moved that the issue be referred to the Transportation Committee; Charley Mims declared consensus that the issue would be referred to James Balesh for further review. Mr. Robertson was asked about ADA compliant sidewalk access, detailed his department’s efforts and Mr. Mims asked Mr. Robertson for the name of a resource person in his department that could be contacted by the Transportation Committee. Mr. Robertson named Abraham Novarro, at 213-485-5681. Richard Spicer asked if the issue is time-sensitive, with reference to the motion to the City Council, and noted that an example of well-done sidewalk repair is available one block north of Vermont between Franklin and Hollywood Boulevard. Mr. Robertson provided details on how the $100,000 fund for repaving streets could be allocated and discussed how his office chooses which streets to repave and how resurfacing is accomplished. He named Bruce Jones, at 213-485-3427, as the contact person in his office for resurfacing. Charley Mims asked about concrete street resurfacing; Mr. Robertson discussed what affected the decision to repave a concrete street. As a result of a question asked by Joel Friedman, Mayor Villaraigosa’s pothole program initiative and pothole repair in general were discussed. Mr. Robertson also detailed what it would take to bring the entire Los Angeles street system into good repair. In summation, Mr. Robertson recognized efforts by Neighborhood Councils that have increased his department’s effectiveness and detailed future efforts for street repair. 6. PLANNING/ZONING & HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE (taken out of order): (a) 3341 Rowena Avenue Ron Weinstein detailed circumstances behind the Neighborhood Council’s approval of a project to be located at 3341 Rowena and mentioned objections voiced regarding the proposed project and its alley access. Representatives of the developer of a property located at 3341 Rowena Avenue, Rick Abramson and Gregory Fischer, as well as stakeholders living next door to the proposed project, Jerry and Mary de Wilde, were present. Mr. Fischer discussed the interests and concerns that influenced design of the proposed project, in particular vehicular access through an alleyway that was dictated by the Department of Transportation. Mr. Fischer noted that the proposed project was under density; there could have been 8 units rather than the 6 that are intended; street parking is increased rather than decreased. Mr. Fischer compared the proposed project to existing buildings and reiterated that “urbanistically” the project is more neighborhood friendly. Mr. Fischer detailed how the proposed project will be developed and what ramifications may occur, noted that the development is considered “by right,” and referred to a discretionary request (a zoning administrator’s adjustment) to allow for 30 feet high construction for some of the buildings on this sloped property. Jerry de Wilde, who lives in a private residence at 3347 Rowena, spoke of the effect the property’s height will have on his quality of life. Mr. de Wilde indicated that he was told that there will be a 30 foot height limit for the property, which he felt was inaccurate. The height issue was clarified. Mr. de Wilde expressed concern about traffic into and out of the alley that will abut the property. Mr. Fischer noted that the developer plans to improve the alleyway. Mary de Wilde noted that the proposed project is out of character with the neighborhood, and that the density of the property is quite different. Charley Mims asked if the individual units would be owned by the inhabitants; Mr. Fischer replied in the affirmative, and noted that he plans to purchase one of the units himself. Kerry Hunnewell discussed the zoning for this area, and pointed out that there was some attempt to design a structure that is an improvement over an apartment building. Mary de Wilde reiterated her belief that the proposed development is out of character with the neighborhood. Jerry de Wilde noted that garages with doors can affect available street parking; he referred to traffic on Rowena that resulted from avoidance of the “Los Feliz mess.” James Balesh expressed sympathy for the de Wildes. Molly Rysman noted that if a precedent is to be set, supporting this well-designed project is a good one to be set, and that Rowena Street with its mix of apartment buildings and single family homes is an appropriate location. Richard Spicer commented on concerns expressed about height and density; Mr. Fischer indicated that the proposed project will be 7-9 feet higher than the neighboring apartment building. MOTION by Ron Weinstein to supplement the Committee’s prior approval of this project by providing an amendment to the motion to encourage the developer to improve the existing alleyway; seconded by Cheryl Johnson. Discussion ranged from how best to effect the alleyway’s improvement and not putting the burden of improving the alleyway solely on the developer, to support of this well-designed proposed project, to a suggestion that the developer contact Mr. Robertson’s office to discuss improving that alleyway. Mr. and Mrs. de Wilde reiterated their concerns. Mr. Mims thanked Mr. and Mrs. de Wilde for attending the meeting and reiterated that a joint effort to improve the alleyway is an appropriate action. There being no further discussion, and no strong objections raised by the Board members, Mims declared a consensus. (b) 4500 Los Feliz Boulevard Project Ron Weinstein asked Ken Owen, who prepared the report, to present to the Committee. Charley Mims stated he had spoken to Allison Cohen, who can run a quarter page advertisement concerning the November meeting in the September and October issues of the Ledger at a cost of $200 an issue. Discussion ensued about timing of advertising, planned outreach efforts, number of attendees, number of planned meetings and location. MOTION by Molly Rysman to hold a public hearing at the Parish Hall of Our Mother of Good Counsel on November 10, 2005 for the purpose of discussing the 4500 Los Feliz Boulevard project; seconded by Bruce Carroll. Ron Weinstein noted disagreement within the Planning Committee about whether to have one or two meetings; Mr. Weisman suggested scheduling one meeting. Phil Gasteier advised that legal requirements should be discussed and that the concerned Councilpeople should be “up front” somewhere. Mr. Gasteier also advised against requiring 300 packages of materials for distribution and that models be built. Kerry Hunnewell asked if the developer was aware that the meeting is planning; Mr. Weinstein stated that the developer is aware and is planning their own meeting. Mr. Hunnewell also stated that the proposed budget is 10% of the GGPNC annual budget. Cheryl Johnson stated that the developer’s plans were not that concrete and asked if the expenditure is appropriate to the situation. Charley Mims noted that the GGPNC has the authority to set a public forum for discussion of issues like this one. Joe Cisneros declared that the idea to discuss this issue in a public forum, stated that the neighborhood was owed the opportunity to be made aware of what is proposed, and noted his rationale for holding two separate meetings (one to present the project and the other to discuss the project). Rosemary de Monte advised she had been told that Whole Foods Market had asked to participate, which had not been part of the developer’s plans previously; Ms. De Monte talked about inviting LFIA. Richard Spicer suggested having the developer speak first in the meeting. MOTION by Joel Friedman that only one meeting be held; seconded by Kerry Hunnewell. Jacqueline Kerr declared her support of asking the developer to provide a model. Ken Owen stated that he had asked a photographer to create a rendering that would create an image that approximates the project. Nyla Arslanian commented that this is a terrific outreach opportunity. Molly Rysman agreed with Ms. Arslanian and emphasized that the Council should remain objective and impartial. Nyla Arslanian and Bruce Carroll will work together to produce a press release for this public forum. It was agreed that wording should include non-inflammatory, unbiased references to the proposal for the development of the Derby site. Charley Mims discussed how the meeting’s agenda should be structured: A clear statement of the property owner/developer’s legal rights first, then a presentation by the developer on what is proposed. Rosemary de Monte reported that the meeting she attended last week made it clear that the developer had no intent to retain the Derby structure, where a 30,000 footprint plan was discussed. It was agreed that the developer will be asked discuss the proposed project. It was agreed that the meeting will be convened as a GGPNC special board meeting for the purpose of discussion of the issue at hand. Richard Spicer noted that the developer had promised to return to the Board in September or October 2005. MOTION by Kerry Hunnewell that the Board allocate up to $5000 for the purpose of a public hearing on this project, primarily to disseminate information on what the developer’s proposals are; seconded by Cheryl Johnson. Charley Mims reiterated that control of how the meeting is conducted should be kept by the Board. Philip Gasteier noted that proponents of the preservation of the Derby property should be given an opportunity to present their viewpoint equal to that given to the developer. Johnson, noting the lateness of the hour, suggested the Committee set the format of the forum. After extensive discussion, Charley Mims declared that consensus was reached on the following points: An open forum to be held on November 10th, in the form of a special meeting of the GGPNC Board for the purpose of a holding a public hearing on the proposed development at 4500 Los Feliz, in the Parish Hall at Our Mother of Good Counsel, for an amount not to exceed $5000. 9. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Rosemary de Monte, as a result of the exigencies resulting from Hurricane Katrina, suggested setting up training for an advance plan. This item was referred to the Public Safety Committee for review and appropriate action. 10. OFFICER AND BOARD VACANCIES Jacqueline Kerr’s resignation as secretary was noted; outreach efforts are recommended to fill the Board vacancy. Charley Mims asked that Board members consider volunteering or possible nominees. 11. OTHER COMMITTEE REPORTS Beautification Committee Nyla Arslanian referred to the Vermont Steps and to the Los Feliz Steps; Jacqueline Kerr noted the $16,000 cost to recast. Ms. Kerr noted Paul’s fundraising efforts. The Committee suggested GGPNC to contribute $3000 to the Vermont Steps. MOTION by Jacqueline Kerr that $3000 be approved for contribution to the Vermont Steps and $1000 be approved for contribution to the Myra Underpass per recommendation by the Beautification Committee; seconded by Nyla Arslanian. Discussion ensued about how best to assist fundraising efforts for both these projects and how much is available in the GGPNC budget for such contributions. Joel Friedman asked for a written report of items to be considered for financial contribution in the future. Charley Mims declared consensus on this issue. Nyla Arslanian reported that the Vermont Triangle project has been increased; medians and a central water feature are being considered. Ms. Arslanian reported asking the landscape architect for minimum and maximum estimates of costs involved. The next meeting is set for November 2005. Ms. Arslanian also reported on “abandoned” bus stops (meaning potential additional parking), and noted DOT’s attention to this issue. The work on the Triangle will be done in two phases; the first phase will begin mid-Fall 2006. The Hollywood Boulevard Streetscape project meeting that took place last week provided initial details on proposed work to be done: fixing curbs and sidewalks in three specific crosswalks and tree planting were specifically mentioned. Plans provided for designating three areas (Thai town, El Salvador, and Little Armenia), with banners, were sketchy and possibly offensive and obstructive. No approval had been made for breaking into the sidewalks to plant trees. Richard Spicer asked if the Beautification Committee had gotten more information back from the Post Office on the parking situation. Rosemary deMonte reported meeting with John… , who indicated another meeting was planned. Ms. deMonte reported being told that there was possibly not a parking problem on New Hampshire. Kerry Hunnewell moved to adjourn at 10:48pm. unapproved draft BOARD MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 16, 2005 Los Feliz Community Police Center 1965 N. Hillhurst, Los Angeles, CA 90027 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/QUORUM CHECK/APPROVAL OF MINUTES The meeting was called to order by President Charley Mims, at 7:05 p.m. without a quorum. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Joe Cisneros, Shana Murphy, Bruce Carroll, Rosemary DeMonte, Jonathan Kaplan, Charley Mims, Philip Gasteier, Ron Weinstein, James Balesh, Richard Spicer, Nyla Arslanian, Jacqueline Kerr, Merlyn Hernandez, and Nora Mosqueda. GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT: Rory Fitzpatrick, Chief Field Deputy, CD #4. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Rory Fitzpatrick, Director of Field Operations for Councilman Tom LaBonge, discussed a document handed to attendees prepared by Councilman Labonge’s office that states the councilman’s position on the proposed Griffith Park Master Plan. The document was backup material for a Resource Board meeting that took place the previous week. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that Councilman LaBonge supports the concept outlined with reference to an Urban Wilderness at Griffith Park. Mr. Fitzpatrick detailed the various proposed Griffith Park projects that Councilman LaBonge supports and does not support. Charley Mims added some insight into the importance of the Cahuenga Peak wildlife corridor. Mr. Fitzpatrick also discussed proposed funding for street improvement and street repair to be provided to each Neighborhood Council. Mr. Fitzpatrick mentioned training had been provided to Neighborhood Councils in the southern part of the City that will be given to all Neighborhood Councils. The discussion of repaving included a historical perspective as well as Mr. Fitzpatrick’s promise to share the list of streets to be resurfaced with GGPNC. Mr. Fitzpatrick quoted statistics concerning deferred maintenance—one-quarter of Los Angeles’ 6000 streets are failing; two-thirds of the streets need repair. 3. SENIOR LEAD OFFICER REPORT AND COMMENTS (unable to attend) (A quorum was established.) 4. APPOINTMENT AND APPROVAL OF NEW BOARD MEMBER, ACTION AS NECESSARY. Jonathan Kaplan motioned to appoint Joel Friedman as a new board member; seconded by Jacqueline Kerr. Mr. Friedman briefly discussed his qualifications, willingness to fulfill a board position, and capabilities. Mr. Friedman noted that he had attended the treasurer training and had been approved by Kevin McNeely. By consensus, Mr. Friedman was accepted to the board. 5. GLOBAL GREEN Richard Spicer, as an introduction to Alex Pugh’s presentation, brought the meeting’s attention to an article from the day’s Los Angeles Times that Mr. Spicer provided as a handout. The article mentioned a renewable energy goal. Mr. Pugh, representative of Global Green USA (www.globalgreen.org), discussed his firm’s proposal to provide renewable resource (solar electric) technology. The intent is an investment by the City of Los Angeles in solar photovoltaic (PV) equipment to be placed on buildings owned by the City. In response to Joe Cisneros’ question, Mr. Pugh noted that his firm, located in Santa Monica, has placed PV equipment in several locations. Philip Gasteier asked about other companies that provide similar services. Ron Weinstein read a motion drafted by Global Green that was discussed at a GGPNC Planning Committee. Charley Mims asked for a motion to be made to the Board. MOTION by Jonathan Kaplan moved to consider a motion drafted by Global Green, to encourage the DWP to ensure that a minimum of 80 megawatts of electricity generation will be generated by solar photovoltaics by the year 2017, for the purposes of discussion. SECOND: Richard Spicer Mr. Kaplan asked how the specific parameters mentioned in Global Green’s proposal were obtained and why other renewable energy options; Mr. Pugh explained his firm felt that DWP had ignored the solar PV renewable resource option, and of existing forms of renewable resources, solar PV is of immediate benefit to urban dwellers. Philip Gasteier noted his opinion that, rather than urge the DWP to adopt this standard, the DWP should study this issue further and prepare a presentation to be made to GGPNC. Mr. Pugh stated that his firm felt that DWP held cost issues as the deciding factor when considering the various renewable resource options, and that an investment in solar PV would have a longer payback term than other renewable resources. Payback time can range, according to Mr. Pugh, from 5 years. Jacqueline Kerr asked if Mr. Pugh could provide names of other organizations that have endorsed the 80 megawatt standard mentioned. Mr. Pugh promised to provide a list to the Board. Mr. Gasteier asked what rationale was used to propel the approach Global Green has used—discussing issue with Neighborhood Councils, for example, rather than confronting DWP; Mr. Pugh stated that DWP was closed to his firm. Ron Weinstein questioned the appropriate venue for discussion of this issue, and remarked that the DWP MOU liaison program was that venue. Bruce Carroll asked about improvements in solar PV technology since 1979; Mr. Pugh noted recent improvements in capacity. Shana Murphy asked if Global Green was a non-profit organization. Joel Friedman asked what cities have conducted research in this area; Mr. Pugh noted recent efforts in San Francisco and Santa Monica as well as the East Coast. Nyla Arslanian asked what percentage 80 megawatts is of the amount of wattage generated in the City of Los Angeles. Mr. Pugh stated that 80 megawatts of solar PV is 5 percent of the 20 percent renewable resource goal. Charley Mims suggested that the issue be referred to the relevant agency of the Citywide Neighborhood Council and that the motion be tabled until the next meeting at which time a DWP representative will be invited to attend. Mr. Mims invited Mr. Pugh to return for the next meeting. The board’s attention was directed back to Agenda Item 1. for approval of the Minutes for the July 19th meeting. AGENDA ITEM #1 REVISITED Richard Spicer requested that an addendum be made to the July 19th meeting minutes, to ensure that item #7 is followed through to completion (an action by the Los Feliz Improvement Association). Charley Mims suggested that, rather than changing or adding to prior meeting minutes, appropriate notation be made in future meeting minutes. Jonathan Kaplan asked about language used to indicate Board approval. Charley Mims stated language he felt appropriate for use in meeting minutes. Bruce Carroll clarified that an historical research study mentioned in Item 6b was brought forward by the developer, not by Mr. Carroll. No other additions or corrections being brought forward, the minutes are approved as amended. Approval of the minutes by consensus. 6. LOS FELIZ CHARTER SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS Marta Alcumbrac and Elizabeth Rainey, Los Feliz Charter School representatives, discussed plans for the elementary school, which is scheduled to open September 2006. Ms. Alcumbrac noted the distinction of a charter school and its attendees. The school’s curriculum will provide education with a focus through the arts. Ms. Alcumbrac mentioned Devora Enwood, who was influential in setting up the Larchmont Charter School. Ms. Alcumbrac discussed funding efforts as well as support from various families and organizations. The proposed site has not yet been determined, an Adventist Church building as well as other sites are being considered. Charley Mims asked about student body selection, why a charter school is beneficial, why is different with a charter school. Ms. Alcumbrac indicated that selection of pupils will be by lottery. A charter school pays its own bills, is run as a business, and gives control back to teachers. Rosemary DeMonte asked if fees will be paid by students. Ms. Alcumbrac’s answer: There is no financial requirement, however, parental involvement and community involvement are required. Ms. Alcumbrac outlined plans for community involvement. James Balesh asked about the stage in the process of obtaining the necessary approval from the School District. Ms. Alcumbrac replied that the charter application will be made in October, and described the subsequent steps to be taken. Ms. Rainey clarified that the student lottery would take place in April or May of 2006, once the charter application is approved. Philip Gasteier asked about the impact on funding for California schools, and was told that Proposition 39 and subsequent legislation provided the basis for establishment of charter schools. Ms. Alcumbrac stated that no resources were to be taken away from public schools. Charley Mims asked if this charter school is approved, would the same allotment (per pupil per day) be given to the new school as is given to LAUSD schools. Ms. Alcumbrac stated that a percentage of the LAUSD amount is given to the charter school. Ms. Rainey provided additional information. Bruce Carroll asked if transportation to school for students outside of the Los Feliz area will have an effect on traffic in the area. Ms. Alcumbrac indicated that this issue is one that will have to be addressed with the charter application and with LAUSD. Joe Cisneros asked about reaction from the Barnsdall Park administration. Ms. Alcumbrac replied that a dialogue with Barnsdall would be appreciated. Merlyn Hernandez asked about 501.3.c application being made. Ms. Alcumbrac outlined the activities taking place, indicated that non-profit status has been granted and 501.3(c) status is being requested. Ms. Alcumbrac closed by asking for support from attendees. Ms. Rainey added to Ms. Alcumbrac’s request. A means of exchanging information via the Internet was proposed and agreed upon. Jonathan Kaplan voiced his support of the Charter School and asked that Ms. Alcumbrac return to future meetings to update the Board on the school’s progress. Ms. Alcumbrac urged attendees to contact her. 7. PARKS, RIVERS & OPEN SPACE COMMITTEE, BERNADETTE SOTER. Establishing Urban Wildlife Designation in Griffith Park Ms. Soter reported that two meetings of the Griffith Park Master Plan Working Group took place in July and August; the next meeting is scheduled for September 12th at Griffith Park Ranger Station. The Working Group has representatives from Franklin Hills, Hollywood United Neighborhood Council, GGPNC, the Los Feliz Improvement Association, the Oaks Homeowners Association, the Atwater Village Council, ETI, xxx38, Sierra Club, Toluca Lake Neighborhood Council, Marshall High, and golf interests, plus ex officio representatives from the City of Los Angeles available on an advisory basis. Ms. Soter summarized details about how the group is governed and what its functions will be, as well as goals and vision for the park. Funding for the next iteration of the master plan has not yet been finalized. Ms. Soter invited all interested parties to attend the upcoming meeting. Ms. Soter will e-mail a copy of the meeting minutes to Bruce Carroll, who will provide a link from the GGPNC web site. Ms. Soter noted that Debs Park will be used as a model to establish the proposed Urban Wilderness, and provided background information on the Debs Park Framework plan, as well as proposed plans for Griffith Park. Ms. Soter stated that the PROS Committee, at its last meeting, reviewed the framework plan and endorsed the Urban Wilderness petition. Ms. Soter asked the board to conceptually endorse the Griffin Park Urban Wilderness petition, which is now in the public comment period; Ms. Soter stated that this action is appropriate at this time. Charley Mims asked if a draft resolution had been prepared for presentation to the committee, however, no draft resolution was offered. Philip Gasteier asked what involvement the Debs plan calls for from the Audubon Society. Ms. Soter referred to a City Council motion that she provided to the Board; the motion refers to the Framework plan, and stated that she does not believe the involvement of the Audubon Society is not necessary. Jacqueline Kerr asked what is the difference between the Debs Park Framework Plan and the Deb Park Land Use Agreement; Ms. Soter explained that the Land Use Agreement is a subset of the Framework plan. MOTION by Jonathan Kaplan that the GGPNC recommend that the final version of the Griffith Park master plan, currently in draft form, establish an Urban Wilderness in Griffith Park, protecting its remaining unused spaces. The current user access will not be affected by this designation, but the establishment of this protected zone will help ensure the survival of Griffith Park’s natural ecosystem—its indigenous plants and animals—and the continuation of its unique historic identity. SECOND: Philip Gasteier. James Balesh asked if planned construction, such as parking structures, would be outside the designated wilderness area. Ms. Soter replied that some parking structures would be outside the area, but some would not. Richard Spicer noted his conviction that it is premature to take any action, until the board has a better understanding of what is going on. Mr. Spicer asked about an inventory of indigenous plants and animals. Mr. Spicer mentioned the Working Groups’ goals. Jonathan Kaplan noted his opinion that, as the Griffith Park advisory group, consideration of these issues is important. Mr. Kaplan stated that he felt discussion of this issue at this point is crucial. Kristin Sabo, Amir’s Garden caretaker, stated that the phrase “current user access” in the petition is objectionable. Bruce Carroll agreed with Ms. Sabo’s comment, noting that ‘current user” should be “current uses.” Mr. Mims stepped down from the chair to discuss the process by which changes could be made to a master plan, noting that the details in this instance are crucial and that he would personally support Mr. Kaplan’s position. Ms. Soter agreed to the amendment. The petition’s wording is amended to “I join with the Los Feliz Improvement Association, Oaks Homeowners Association, Hollywood United Neighborhood Council, and a coalition of Griffith Park users in recommending that the final version of the Griffith Park Master Plan, currently in draft form, establish an Urban Wilderness in Griffith Park protecting its remaining open spaces. Current uses will not be affected by the designation, but the establishment of this protected zone will help ensure the survival of Griffith Park’s natural eco-system—its indigenous plants and animals—and the continuation of its unique historic identity.” Mr. Spicer noted that he could not vote on the issue, and stated his objection to the motion. VOTE: 14 in favor; one against. 8. PLANNING, ZONING & HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE (a) Criteria for Hiring of New City Planning Director Mr. Weinstein noted changes recommended by Molly Rysman, Planning Committee member, to a letter to Mayor Villaraigosa regarding the criteria for hiring a new City Planning Director. MOTION by Ron Weinstein moved to accept the recommended changes. SECOND: Jacqueline Kerr. VOTE: The motion passed by consensus. (b) 4500 Los Feliz Blvd; Establishment of Ad Hoc Committee Ron Weinstein reported that the developer is redefining plans for that project. MOTION by Ron Weinstein moved to establish an Ad Hoc Committee whose concern will be the property located at 4500 Los Feliz Bolvd. SECOND: Richard Spicer. Mr. Weinstein suggested that the committee should be chaired by Ken Owen. Rebecca Goodman, Save the Derby Coalition, discussed efforts on behalf of opposition to the project. Ms. Goodman noted outreach efforts, including a website, a network (listserve bulletin board), and voiced support of the formation of an ad hoc committee. Ms. Goodman asked for access to the Historic Resource Report prepared by the developer. Ron Weinstein mentioned that the report had been requested from the developer; the request was deferred by the developer, indicating that the report would be provided at the next presentation with other information. Debra Levine, stakeholder, LA Conservancy, Modern Committee, corroborated Ms. Goodman’s comments, and reported that her own outreach efforts indicated that the public is not aware that the building is “in motion.” In response to Jacqueline Kerr’s question about what organizations have supported or endorsed the Save the Derby Coalition’s efforts, Ms. Goodman noted that there have not yet been formal endorsements, due to the various processes involved. Ms. Goodman listed the agencies to which her group has made presentations or contacted. In response to a comment from Nora Mosqueda, Ms. Goodman gave a historical perspective on the various locations the Brown Derby has had. VOTE: Charley Mims declared a consensus on this issue and the formation of an ad hoc committee. Ron Weinstein suggested that the outreach committee work in conjunction with the newly-formed ad hoc committee. 9. ELECTION OF TREASURER MOTION by Jonathan Kaplan moved to appoint Joel Friedman. SECOND: Jacqueline Kerr. By common consent, Mr. Friedman is appointed Treasurer. 10. TWO PART BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2005/2006 Nora Mosqueda presented the preliminary budget for the GGPNC for fiscal year 2005/2006. Ms. Mosqueda noted that planned expenditure for outreach totals $42,900 and listed planned activities that would come under the outreach banner. Charley Mims mentioned guidelines discussed at treasurer training he attended, as a rationale for the broad categorization. MOTION by Jonathan Kaplan moved to approve the budget as submitted. SECOND: Rosemary DeMonte. Charley Mims declared a consensus on this issue. 11. STATUS OF MPA BUS LINE (#175) Richard Spicer reported on information provided by Matt MTA has proposed to reduce the 175 service during the midday starting in September 2005. Mr. Spicer suggested approaching the MTA representative to explore alternatives to reducing service. Mr. Spicer will contact MTA. 12. BY-LAWS AMENDMENT: SIMPLE QUORUM MOTION by Bruce Carroll moved to change by-laws to establish a quorum by a minimum of 10 members SECOND: Nora Mosqueda. Charley Mims declared a consensus on this issue. 13. Other Committee Reports Police Public Safety Jacqueline Kerr stated Brett Blumstein has volunteered to co-chair the most eastern region of the GGPNC District. Ms. Kerr introduced Mr. Blumstein. Charley Mims welcomed Mr. Blumstein. Neighborhood Improvement Jacqueline Kerr discussed a competition for a mural at King Middle School to be installed in the Myra Underpass next to a mural just completed. Students’ concepts will be sent to Bruce Carroll for publication on the FHRA and GGPNC websites, and public input will guide selection. Ms. Kerr further said that the original funding of $3,000 for the original mural had generated this expansion of the artwork to King Middle School’s involvement. |